From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Tue Mar 16 15:50:03 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!newsfeed.nyu.edu!news.idt.net!nyd.news.ans.net!news-w.ans.net!news.lava.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 16 Mar 1999 22:50:03 -0000
Subject: FZ BIBLE 20/35 SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT 9TH ACC
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Message-ID: <713bab697c3ede6fa31d207cc092c65e@anonymous.poster>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1029
Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:690025 alt.clearing.technology:76132

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

9th ACC - THE SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT CASSETTES 20/35

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


9TH ACC CONTENTS

December 1954 to January 1955 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Based on the solution to entrappment cassette version.

F# = File number (** = not available)
O# = Original Number (according to the master list posted by Pilot)
REN = As renumbered in the Solution to Entrappment cassettes

F# O#  REN  DATE  TITLE

01  1   1  Dec  6 Introduction to 9th ACC: Havingness
02  2   2  Dec  7 The Essence of Auditing, Know to Mystery Scale
03  3   3  Dec  8 Rundown on Six Basics
04  4   4  Dec  9 Communication Formula
05  5   5  Dec 10 The Practice of Dianetics and Scientology
06  6   6  Dec 13 Conduct of the Auditor
07  7   7  Dec 14 Mechanics of Communication
08  8   8  Dec 15 Havingness
09  9   9  Dec 16 Pan-determinism and One-way Flows
10  9A 10  Dec 17 Hist. & Dev. of Processes: Games & Limitations in Games
11  9B 10A Dec 17 History and Development of Processes: Q&A Period
12 10  11  Dec 20 Games (Fighting)
13 11  12  Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part I
14 11A 12A Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part II
15 12  13  Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing
16 12A 13A Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing: Question and Answer Period
17 13  14  Dec 23 Havingness and Communication Formulas
** 13A --  Dec 23 After Lecture Comments   
18 14  15  Dec 24 Pan-determinism
19 14A 15A Dec 24 Pan-determinism: Question and Answer Period
20 15  16  Dec 27 Training New People
** 15A --  Dec 27 Curiosa from Dianetics 55!
21 16  17  Jan  3 Auditing Requirements, Differences
22 16A 18  Jan  4 Time
** 16AA -  Jan  4 Q&A Period
23 17  19  Jan  5 Auditing at Optimum
24 18  20  Jan  6 Exteriorization
25 19  21  Jan  7 Elementary Material: Know to Mystery Scale
26 20  22  Jan 10 Education: Goals in Society -- Adult Education
27 21  23  Jan 11 Fundamentals of Auditing
** 21A --  Jan 11 Auditors' Conference
28 22  24  Jan 12 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part I
29 23  25  Jan 13 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part II
30 24  26  Jan 14 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part III
31 25  27  Jan 17 Auditing Demonstration: Six Basics in Action
** 25A --  Jan 17 Auditors' Conference
32 26  28  Jan 18 Auditing Demonstration: Spotting Spots
** 26A --  Jan 18 Auditors' Conference
33 27  29  Jan 19 Auditing Demonstration: Exteriorization
34 28  30  Jan 20 Background Music to Living
35 29  31  Jan 21 Axioms: Laws of Consideration -- What an Axiom Is

Note that 6 of the 9 discussion periods (Q&A periods, Auditors'
Conferences, etc.) were omitted from the cassettes, leaving us
with only 35 files instead of the 41 that were recorded.  It is
also possible that material was edited out of the lectures which
are available.  If anyone has a set of the original reels, please
post any missing material.

========================

9ACC file 20/35

9th ACC 15 (16) - TRAINING NEW PEOPLE

Transcript of lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 9ACC15    -    
5412C27 Renumbered 16 for "The Solution To Entrapment"
cassettes

TRAINING NEW PEOPLE

A lecture given on 27 December 1954


I will not make any straight talks to the students,
throughout this week, as usual during a congress, but of
course everybody will be, at the congress, you'll be at the
congress, and there will be a specific set of seats for
you. The reason for this is to - so I can look over, at
this particular battery of seats, and find out whether or
not you're still alive, or bored to death! And to present a
little unity at the congress.

[The Unification Congress lectures were given on Dec 28
to 31 - Editors]

Now, the people, who will be there, are for the most part,
entirely sold on the idea that they know something about
Dianetics and Scientology. They believe this. If they
believe anything, they believe this. There will be a
handful, one, two, three dragged unwillingly from
Milwaukee, or someplace, by big brother, who have never
read anything and who know less, anyhow, but, there will be
others who for the most part believe utterly that they know
something about Dianetics and Scientology. Want to give you
an idea here, of the people who come to the congress. The
most part - these people have not been trained in Dianetics
and Scientology and an amazing number of them have been
trained, are former students, and so on. But those who have
not been trained present one of the most interesting
pictures that you and I will ever behold. And I want to
talk to you just for a moment about that person, because
you'll meet this person all the time.

There's nothing wrong with this person. It's just that he's
in a delusory state. He is slightly hallucinatory. He
thinks he knows something about Dianetics and Scientology.
And that is delusive.

He will present a problem to you for this reason: You will
think he knows something about Dianetics and Scientology,
too. And that is really the only reason he presents a
problem to you. That is what is peculiar about this. The
professional auditor is met everywhere by this person. A
person who tells you glibly that he knows all about
Dianetics and Scientology. We have heard many times of what
we call "Book Auditors." I've straightened out enough Book
Auditor cases to know that Book Auditors exist.

What I have not at any time ever bought, one hundred
percent, the idea that all somebody had to do was read a
book, and immediately became capable as an auditor. I've
heard people doing this, I've heard people say that they
have gotten remarkable results. I'm sure they have. We have
to pursue our even tenor of our ways, by going on and
admitting that people can do this sort of thing. But the
truth of the matter is we have had Book Auditor after Book
Auditor in at the Foundations and here, and examined them
hopefully, extending to them a certificate, with no strings
attached. All they had to do was pass an examination. And
they would have immediately been given an HDA or an HCA
certificate. That's all. Because they had done good work in
the field.

Although you haven't probably heard anything about this for
a year, that is still a fact. Still a fact, we've always
got to keep that door open, that somebody somewhere has
read all the publications, knows his stuff, Simply walks
in, passes an examination, gives an example of good
auditing, and gets a certificate, just like that. No
training or schooling involved of any kind whatsoever.

And we have examined, sincerely, exactly in the frame of
reference that this person has studied, and remember, the -
well the - one of the area examinations that Doctor Steves
has is based entirely and completely upon the fact that
somebody has heard some of the earlier tapes and read some
of the earlier publications and there isn't a single
examination question in there that hasn't been adequately
covered by the materials easily available to individuals.
And these people walk in to take this examination and you
would weep. You would just weep! This is the person who has
been expressing his opinion so gorgeously, and so
enthetesquely, all over the field. This is the person who
has been having such wonderful results with auditing.

And just thee and me could say, in a snide sort of way,
"Oh, yeah?" What is the dynamic principle of existence?

Male voice: Survive.

You know, because you've been trained! But how about the
guy out there, who passes this Book Auditor's examination?
He doesn't pass it. Because he leaves it blank! Name the
buttons of the Chart of Attitudes. If he'd just name a
couple, we'd be happy! Name the - name the basic definition
of an engram. If he'd just say "pain and unconsciousness,"
we would again be happy! Name - what is a secondary? If he
just wouldn't say it's what comes after a firstary, we
would be very cheerful!

I'm not running this person down! Don't get the idea of
that. But I'm trying to tell you, a professional auditor,
in training or already long since trained, that your
activities are to a very marked degree influenced by this
individual who believes he's an auditor and can audit, and
I'm here to tell you, amongst us girls, that he can't.

Now, I, the - a lot of people come along and say, "Well I
really know this subject. I can't put it down on paper but
I really know it ..." I'm not looking at anybody right now.
"I really know this subject. I can't put it down on paper.
But - I can't pass an examination about it, but I really know
it." "All right, if you can't put it down on paper, let me
ask you verbally, what is the dynamic principle of existence?"

"Huh?"

"Give me the cycle of action of the MEST universe.

"The what?"

All right, I'm being maybe catty by talking this way, but
remember, all I'm telling you, all I'm giving you, is the
experience on the part of Foundation and organization
examiners, who kindly and pleasantly, and sweetly, and
without any strings attached, would have simply handed a
certificate out, swish! If the person could have passed the
examination.

And their experience has been that an awful lot of people
think they are talking through and with Dianetics and
Scientology, and these people are talking through their
hat! That's about all you can say about it. How they get
results, Lord only knows!

A beautiful little piece of work, which a fellow did out of
some of the work in one of the clinical courses, Issue
31-G, of the Journal of Scientology, has gone completely
begging. It is stacked on our shelves many, many feet deep.
We would be very happy to roll up bundles of them and send
them out to people, if they would simply sit down and start
into the first one, "Give me something that you might be
able to think had some reality vaguely - we're not forcing
you - connected with it, in the environment."

Now, if - it says any two people can do it. Do you know that
there are enormous numbers of people out around the country
and around the world, who buy these publications? They
don't buy that one! Now, they will buy one on either side
of it, you might say. They will buy later ones, and so
forth. But that particular one is so devilishly specific,
as a straightwire situation. You know, it's all set up. Boom!

Now, the funny part of it is, 'ole Self Analysis, in its
most unworkable form, went like hot cakes. You know, it's
just Self Analysis. Self Analysis in Dianetics is a later
revised publication. Self Analysis is the name of that
first Foundation publication. Well, that is a peculiar
publication. It has been used a great deal. Well, some - I
should think somewhere in the neighborhood of about forty
thousand copies of that thing have been circulated through
the United States and the rest of the world. And when it
was revised and became extremely workable, twenty-five
hundred copies of it were sold. Peculiar, isn't it?

The acceptance level of the world at large of a complete
and positively working system, and organization of axioms
and procedures, which alter and change the condition of
human existence, is something that doesn't. The only
conclusion that we can draw from this, the general
acceptance level of terrific effectiveness does not really
exist, as a good acceptance level. They would much rather
go down the street, to a bucket shop, and buy some
psychoanalysis at ten thousand dollars for two years' worth.

Every once in a while, by the way, just as an aside, an
auditor feels embarrassed by suddenly saying to somebody
"Well, it'll cost you five hundred dollars to get enough
processing for me to do you any good." We realize he
probably should have said "Three thousand dollars," you
know, he should have said this much. He shouldn't be
embarrassed. The only other therapy available anywhere is
psychoanalysis, two years' worth; conclusion at the end of
the time: being careful. And the individual's brought in a
condition where he can now be careful. He has to walk on
eggs. This is the frame of mind that is arranged usually - 
a review of such people. And it is costing ten thousand
dollars. Nine hundred - on the average this is what it costs
him; it's cost him nine thousand, four hundred and
thirty-six dollars and forty-nine cents. That is the exact
figure, calculated from the returns and receipts and taxes
and income tax reports of psychoanalysts.

He spent nine thousand five hundred dollars, you might say,
for nothing. For nothing! Because I certainly would not
call the company of most analysts I know anything! All
right. And an auditor's going to work with this person for
three, four, five weeks, and at the end of three, four,
five weeks, why, this person is going to have come to some
conclusion about existence. He will be in better condition,
and he will be able to front the world like he has never
done before, he has also had as an added bonus, usually,
the fact that he can't be killed, which is quite a relief
to most people, and he has had good company during the
period. So, remember, remember then, that three thousand
dollars for a processing series would be very, very slight.
It's just one-third of the nothingness that psychoanalysis
hands you for ten thousand.

All right. The professional auditor - that's just an aside,
something I'll probably forget to mention again - the person
who believes he knows something about Dianetics and
Scientology, believes he knows something about auditing, is
usually predicating his conclusion upon the study and
practice of some other therapy earlier. He knows that he can
have some conversance with human beings on the level of
psychology. And he then and thereafter evaluates Dianetics
and Scientology from the standpoint of psychology. Or he
knows he has had some luck with people in the field of
chiropractry. These are quite - these are occasionally
workable things, you see, I mean it's not a total blank,
like psychoanalyst-analysis is. And, psychoanalysis might
not be if they practiced it - by the way he had the same
problem, they practiced it like Freud taught it. The end of
one of his books says, "Nobody ever practices this like I
taught it!" "And therefore it's going to flop." He says it
in very scholarly German, but he says it!

And this person, this person, believes he knows something
about this, and actually would absorb a tremendous amount
of data on the subject without being cognizant of what
that data is. This is a most peculiar and baffling thing.
The communication of livingness and life. Communication on
the subject of livingness and life is so intensely
restimulative to the normal individual, whoever he is, is
so intensely restimulative, that this individual cannot
absorb the data.

And you say to him, "Say! We've really got something here,
the dynamic principle of existence is survival!" And this
fellow says, "Gee, that's real interesting! Hippocrates
once said" - relative datum - "that a patient had to tell 
about his operation five times before he was really well."
Relative datum:

"The worship of the sun god Ra was accomplished by going
forth at dawn and saying, 'Oh, Ra, thou in thy glory.'"
Comparable datum: 'All the fish in the ocean mostly have
tails." Comparable datum: "You should never eat watermelon
pickles after you have drunk beer" Comparable datum. You
get the idea? A=A=A=A.

Here you take a scientific fact that's got the deadliness
of a ray gun. See? And they say, "Well, we know all about
that fact!" Cap pistol, cap pistol, water pistol. No
differentiation.

Now, you today, have no - none of you, have any real
difficulty with comm lag. We ask auditing questions and we
do processes, which are intensely interesting from the
subject of comm lag. Because they can produce comm lags on
practically anybody, you know. You ask them the question,
and the guy - he knows he hasn't got a communication lag when
talking to his fellow man, and he says, "... (gulp) ..." So, 
here - here we have this - this interesting, this
tremendously fascinating thing called comm lag. And, if you
were comm lagging around to your fellow man, in the normal
course of human existence; he walks in and he said, "How
would you like to go to a show tonight?" and you were to
say, "I don't like the coat you're wearing."

Today, at your state and level of processing you couldn't
imagine yourself doing that, could you? Well, that's
normal! How are you going to feed this guy any data, in
addition to this A = A = A comparable datum, ray guns = cap
pistols = a kitten sneezing. How are you going to feed him
any data if you're also going across - which is part and
parcel of the same thing, a comm lag? An incoming comm lag?
An outgoing comm lag? A reproducing comm lag? All these
comm lags. You know, we're so used to them in auditing
sessions, we laugh about them so much, they are so amusing
in general, that we don't get around enough to find out
that they're normal as hell!

I went down to a fellow the other day, and he was busy,
shuffling some Christmas presents and so forth out to the
customers, and so on, and I said, "Have you got something
here for a two-year-old child?" And this fellow looked at
me and he says, "Well, how old is your child?" And I said,
"Well, have you got something for a two-year-old child?"
And he said, "Well, is it a boy or a girl?" and I felt that
was sequitur, you see. And, he says, "Well," he said, "now,
how about this, over here?" and shows me an Erector Set.
And I said, "Well isn't this for an older child?" "Yes," he
says, "but how old is your child?"

It wasn't that we were talking too quietly! I actually
asked him the question by count, because I was counting it
like this... And I exhausted my fingers, and I had not yet
gotten an answer! But just as I was leaving the store, not
having bought anything, he looked at me rather fixedly, and
he said, "You know, all of our stuff for two-year-olds is
in the back of the store." It had started to leak in. And
I'll bet you if we'd cross-questioned him we would have
found out that he thought that was his own idea! That some
inspiration had just occurred there, which gave him a
hunch! A hint would have been the next step on the gradient
scale, he would have realized that I'd given him a hint!
All right. 

As we look over the comm lag situation, as we look over 
the data, as we look over the fact that people are very 
often deeply rooted in earlier therapies of one kind or 
another, which to them have given them a lot of wins, or 
a lot of loses equally detrimental, that they're evaluating 
from that basis, and that they're saying they know about 
it simply because it is not the thing to do to go around 
saying you're stupid! And if we look at it from that basis, 
we realize how very, very few people in the thousands and 
thousands and thousands of people, who have some cognizance 
of Dianetics and Scientology - we actually recognize how 
much they really do know about the subject. We have, remember, 
examined the best, and we have been willing to give them a 
certificate, and the certificates are still here, and they 
have never been given away.

Merely because the fellow had to get a passing grade on the
basic examination. He even could have come back and taken
the examination. I mean, any kind of an arrangement you
could think of, and yet he did not get his certificate.
Well, I can tell you that if he did not get his certificate
then he did not get his results with Dianetics and
Scientology, and we don't know then what he was doing! See?
We wouldn't know then what he was doing!

All right. The very fact of interest in Dianetics and
Scientology is in itself a very good manifestation as far
as somebody is concerned. He gets interested in this, it
shows that he's looking for a way out, he's perfectly
willing to be open-minded about it. Let's not credit him
at the same time with complete wisdom on the subject. So,
you, as professional students, during this coming week, are
going to run into an awful lot of people who are really
sharp! You know? They are really sharp! They're not
professionals, but they're really sharp, you know? They
know all about it. They've gotten terrific results. The
last time - the last time they told this fellow's id to
regurgitate and so forth, they got the most "asponding
respondo" that you ever saw in your life.

That's how much sense it'd make if you took it apart. Why
am I telling you anything like this? Why should I? Why
should I be this snide about people? Mostly because the
years have made me so! You see no faintest trace of
bitterness in this, but you do see a little bit of care!
Care to be taken with an auditor under training that he
doesn't get out without knowing what he's doing. If he
knows what he's doing, believe me, he can do fantastic and
wonderful things! If he knows what he is doing.

It is a shame and a crime to educate anybody in the field
of Dianetics and Scientology, you know, to bring them that
close in to really knowing what they're doing, without
actually giving them the information. Without actually
getting through to them, how to do it, what to use, and so
on. That is a shame. We saw this, by the way, in an
Advanced Clinical Unit a short time ago - a fellow who had
been going round and round in Dianetics, but had - actually
never had gotten very sharp on the subject of Dianetics.
Never had. Actually went through the Unit. And, for six
weeks there, was very anxious for data, on a sort of a
relay basis. He himself was not picking up the data, but he
was putting it down in such a way that he could give it to
a student, or something like this.

The data was not for him. He was not available, really,
while he was being trained. And we gave him processing, and
we brought him quite a little way up the line, was in a lot
better shape, he knew a lot more when he went away, but it
was actually a shame that this individual went away not
knowing that the materials he had, really worked. That was
a shame, that this occurred.

However, this fellow was in a hurry. There was not such a
thing on schedule for him as retraining, there was not such
a thing as hanging over in a Unit, until he himself knew,
and none of his fellow students knew how terrible that
guy's case was. The guy was an interesting mock-up, which
was doing the rational and sane thing. He, as a person, was
actually almost a circuit. And where he was, it was pretty
hard to tell. And the six weeks he got of processing were
not enough to break through this. And I think they were not
enough to break through this because his fellow students
were for the most part fresh in Dianetics and Scientology.
They were very fresh. They had - they had not been with it
very long, see? They had no great coguizance of cases. They
didn't have an evaluation of this sort of thing. The fellow
sounded, and sounds today, so rational.

Of course today, he has some slight feeling like there is
something more he should know. He does have this feeling,
that he ought to go out and use it this way now, and, maybe
something - well, we don't know, but it might - of course it
would probably work better if we varied it, well, no, no,
we will work it this way, you see. We've at least got him
faced up to the probability that he will work 8-C, for
instance, as 8-C. We've got him faced up, that far. And if
we've gotten him faced up that far, he will not be able to
work 8-C for three or four months, on various people, and
so forth, without getting a lot of it himself. And the next
time we see that boy, he will be in pretty good shape.

All right. Now, here is something of great interest.
Something that nobody has entirely recognized, even if
you're told it. And that is that case level depends upon
the ability to express a pan-determinism across the field
of human ability and aberration. If an individual can exert
a pan-determinism over any field, believe me, it has not
the ability to worry him. If you remember - you... now, you
might have a modern car which has occasionally given you a
bad moment in driving. You know, it's occasionally given
you a bad moment. You took the corner, and you took it all
right, and you landed upright at the other side of it, but
it almost two-wheeled around the corner on you. You know
this sort of a feeling.

That's because you don't have a complete pan-determinism
over cars. You might be able to handle that particular car,
but you go down the road, and you see somebody pull a very
fine boo-boo with an automobile, and right away it tells
you that you don't have complete control over cars, you
know. That's why they get the second cross of death after
they get the first one. That first cross simply tells the
motorists, "Look, you don't have control of your
automobile." See? It's saying, "You don't have
pan-determinism across cars."

All right. And if this is the case, if this is the case,
that pan-determinism could actually bring about death - you
can get this view a little bit more when I ask you whether
or not a tricycle worries you particularly. Do tricycles
worry you? Hmm? They don't worry you at all. Well, you
probably have pan-determinism about tricycles! You got the
notion? You see what this is?

All right, do spoons worry you? What is the essential
difference between a spoon and a car? They both move
around, and they both are under somebody's control, hmm?
But a spoon doesn't worry you particularly. But a car
might. That would be simply a matter of pan-determinism
across spoons, wouldn't it? In other words, nothing can
worry you, which you can change, start and stop. That's all
it boils down to. Nothing can worry you, really, that you
can start, stop and change.

And if you as an auditor can take other minds than your
own, and start, change and stop them along various lines;
if you can make people have abilities which before were
pretty smothered, or they didn't have at all; if you can
make people well; if you never got a moment's processing,
you would all of a sudden blow Clear one day. This is a
certainty. You see, you are exerting pan-determinism,
continually, pan-determinism. The only thing bad that could
happen to you is you would run into people who would
consistently and continually resist auditing. And you
might start eventually auditing a little bit compulsively,
because so many people have resisted. But what do you know,
communication processing shows this up as one of the first
things that happens to an auditor, when his case is
audited on communication processing. Now, how interesting.
I mean, the resistances people put up to auditing, and how
he has a cute little ridge, by this time, that's sitting
right here, which is very ready to audit him! See? Click,
click!

Now, this is simply an individual's inability to exert
control in one particular field which flips back at him.
Actually, today, because of two-way communication processes
you have, this happens much less often. You can bring a
person into auditing, and bring them into a session, so
easily, that a lot of times, if you really wanted to be
covert about it they would never know they were being
audited. If you just went on working upon the basic
principles of Scientology, you went right ahead, working
on these basic principles, and you simply audited them, at
the same time carrying on a two-way communication with
them, it'd take some very clever doing, but you might wind
up - somebody all of a sudden might tell you, a few days
hence, all of a sudden say to you, "You know, it's a very
funny thing, I used to have lumbosis, and I don't have
lumbosis anymore! I wonder how this could have happened? It
must have been the Salicilusilic Silly Acid!"

Here's control over such things. If an auditor is a good
auditor, if an auditor is a good auditor, he never has to
worry much about aberration. He can control it. Why should
he worry about it? It makes a nice game. Therefore, if you
start somebody into auditing, you should train them all the
way across the boards, shouldn't you? It would be a mean
thing to do to let a student get away without at least
coming up to a point where his training would continue. By
this I mean, he would use the processes he had been taught.
He might not himself have tremendous conviction on these
things, because he hasn't seen them work on somebody, very
drastically. But he at least knows them well enough, and
knows well enough that he should continue using this
process, and knows well enough when to use this process,
that he will use it, and will arrive at that certainty. Now
that's the least we'll settle for. The very least we'll
settle for under any level of training, today. He knows the
process, knows how to use it. He's certain enough about it
so that he will use that process, and this will at least
produce results for him, and these results themselves will
bring the aberration, psychosomatic illness and
disabilities or inabilities which he faces, will bring
these things under control. And if we could do just that
much with everybody this would be terrific, but if we do
any less than that, we have done a very, very grave and
terrible thing.

See what we've done? We have brought the person up to a
point of where he doesn't know that he knows but he now
feels that something in this particular field might
possibly work, but he doesn't know that he has the answer
to it. See where we're going here? And so the unfortunate
part of it is that although - this is an - a sad thing - although
you have to release materials, make them broadly available,
keep people advised, who are interested, although you have
to do this, one of the reasons why you have to do this by
the way is so the material itself will not get stashed. Or
only be in the hands of a few people, so it'll still be
alive, so it'll still be sitting somewhere, regardless of
any catastrophe or disaster. That material can still sit
there. You've got to release this material. You've got to
place it into people's hands, you understand? Now the idea
is to place it into their hands well enough, or smoothly
enough, so that they can achieve some benefit from it. In
spite of the fact that you're not training them.

And that is one of the oddest problems which we face in
Scientology. The placing of materials in hands which are
not trained hands, which very likely, in the absence of
auditing, and the absence of good, clear practice of the
exact principles which are laid in their hands, will alter
and vary the material in such ways and directions that it
will not produce results for them, and when it doesn't
produce results for them we have actually condemned
somebody to a very, very bad state of beingness. We have
demonstrated to him that he could not control human
ability. Whoa, what an overt act!

All right, my shoulders are wide! I'm responsible, mea
culpa. But, it has to be done. There isn't any solution for
it that I have at this time, except maybe to write more
simply, to write more directively, to write more
communicatably. And so, by doing that at least make more
data arrive in peoples' hands than would have before. Just
from a standpoint of how much communication was
accomplished by the piece of writing, by the formula given,
so forth. In other words, try to accomplish communication
in the absence of training. To date we have never
accomplished it. That's what I meant to tell you at the
beginning, we have never, never accomplished this. It's
almost impossible, to preserve an individual's
self-determinism, at least, to let him think over the
information he is given, to throw this information to him,
adrift in an enormous sea of facts, and hope that it hits
one way or the other, so as not to give him discouragements
and failures which will decrease his determinism over
psychosomatic illness and human aberration.

That is the problem that is faced. And it is by these
congresses that we attempt to solve this problem. And that
is what we're heading for. A congress never under any
circumstances could be considered to be a solution to
training. Under no circumstances whatever could it be
considered as a substitute for training. Just because
somebody has come to two or three congresses does not mean
he has been trained. But some odd and peculiar things
happened in the June congress.

I gave a talk which was off the tape, informal, and off the
record. This was evidently a highly acceptable sort of a -
of a way to address the people, I more or less walked down
front and I told them about spotting spots and remedying
havingness. Was the last hour. It wasn't even a part on the
tape. You wonder that this one hour seems to have gone
home. The one hour went home. Because it was preceded by
about twenty hours of pound. They remembered that one
hour. And I got letters all over the place. I got more
doggone letters from people who had been to that congress,
saying they had used this process and something in the - in
the - in the seventeen or whatever ho - many hours
preceded that last hour's talk had given them some notion
that when you said do a technique it should be done that way!

They'd gotten this - this feeling, you see, out of it, sort
of intuitively. And when it came to that last hour's talk,
they used it, they applied it, and they went back and they
started picking up people's psychosomatic illnesses, and
doing things to redemonstrate their own control over human
aberration.

And a lot of them did it. And it was very successful. But I
wouldn't say that these people who were using that were
very conversant with Dianetics and Scientology. I really
wouldn't say they were. But they were a lot more conversant
with the human mind than anybody else in the country! You
understand? They were a lot more conversant with the human
mind. Almost anybody in Dianetics and Scientology is more
conversant with the human mind than anybody - anybody in the
field of psychiatry. And anybody in the field of
psychology. You see that?

So, this puts them way up here, see? When I tell you they
aren't anyplace yet, you begin to appreciate it after a
routine course of training or something of this sort, you
all of a sudden run head-on into a case which is going
"Glnk! Glnk!" and they say, "Ron didn't say anything, the
Instructor didn't say anything about somebody who's going
'Glnk! Glnk!' and every time I try to process this fellow
all he does is stand and look at me and say, 'Glnk!'"
Wasn't covered in the textbook, take some desperate and
extraordinary solution in order to solidify this.

And then, so you fool around with it, and you do this and
that, and you get very desperate about the whole thing, and
you do this and that, and the fellow does - and is still
going "Glnk!" at you, only this time he's doing it at a
high-pitched scream. And you'll finally get the idea - you
finally get the idea, conclusively, that, perhaps, it might
be a good idea if you went into two-way communication with
him! And you did that, and you say, "Well, it might be a
good idea to get this gibbon to do some step A of 8-C, with
him. Might be!" So, here we have the problem of getting a
person into the threshold of doing something that will tell
him that he now knows. How do we get a person up to that
threshold? That's a rough deal! You've almost created Homo
Novis, or maybe you have, at the moment he just gets his
toe vaguely across this threshold, see? He gets his
toe - "You know, maybe if I do it this way this result will
occur." It's this sort of a certainty will come through to
him, maybe you've tipped the scales right at that point.

Well, we have our first and foremost idea, then, back of
congresses. And that is to take people who are not trained,
or who will not be trained, and because of their
conversance with data, still give them enough information
so that some of them at least will put their toe across
that threshold, and in doing so will employ the processes
more or less as given, to achieve enough results to make it
very definitely worth their doing, you see. In other words
give them some control over pan-determinism so the
liability of having put the information in their hands
doesn't boomerang on them or on us. That's the first
purpose of a congress. The second purpose is to take people
who have been trained and straight across the boards give
them the hot dope, and bring them right on up to date, if
possible. See? As far as possible bring them up to date of
where we are in research and investigation.

Now, writing and investigation will continue, this is
inevitable, but our - it is at the most fantastic point
today, that I ever thought could be reached. I couldn't
envision this sort of a point of certainty. And at this
forthcoming congress during this week, I'm going to take
the materials which have been developed to date and I'm
going to cover them rather rapidly. I'm going to cover them
punched up enough so that some of them will at least hit
home and stay there. And, I'm going to cover them rapidly
enough and yet I hope simply enough, so that these two
goals can be accomplished at one and the same time. One, to
take the person who doesn't know anything about Dianetics
or Scientology, and thinks he does; to bring him up to
where, maybe a little closer - he knows something about
Dianetics and Scientology, you see. He really comes in to
where he might know something about it. That's a gain, you see.

And the other one is to bring old students, graduates, and
so forth, up to a level on research and investigation. And
a third one, a third one, to try with a little group
auditing, simple or complicated, to bring peoples' case
level up a little bit higher. And a fourth one, to continue
the training of yous guys. All of you. See? They have to
have all of these things, otherwise it would not be a
successful congress.

Now, there are odds and ends that I will be going over in a
congress that I would never teach you in class. But more
important, when I go over this material, before a congress,
you will see, I hope, possibly, methods of presenting it.
Frameworks in which to fit it. Which would serve you very
well in trying to talk about it to people at large. And
that is the one thing which I wish you would keep your eye
on during this coming week.

If you look at it now, Dianetics or Scientology; You look
at Scientology now from the standpoint of how do you
communicate it, I wouldn't set myself up as a paragon of
virtue on how to communicate it, although I'm the only one
that has, to any great degree. There's still an enormous
improvement to be made. You will at least know how to
communicate it a little better to groups of people that you
will be intimately connected with and who will be partially
informed. These people particularly - the partially informed,
trying to bring them up so that they're less partially
informed and more completely informed, you hope! And, also
you will see these talks hitting the basis of, telling it
to the streetcar conductor. You see, this - these frames of
reference. Now all of those frames of reference will have
to be there, or I will simply not be communicating to the
congress audience at all. You see?

Now, you will observe, if you please, I will ask you to
observe, during the breaks, and that sort of thing, observe
the people. Observe the people around. And find what - this
is a little research project, it isn't for your education,
it's for ours, all of ours, yours and ours, see? And find
what datum parked where. What were the communicating data?
This is a fascinating field of research. It has more
randomity in it than anything I know of! Lots of randomity!
What was the communicating data?

Now, day after day we worked here in Operation Phoenix,
trying to find the communicating datum, that Phoenix would
buy. And, fantastic! Just fantastic! They'd missed this
one, they'd missed that one, they'd miss another one,
they'd miss another one, they'd miss another one. Uh! And
finally, I got this hot idea about good roads and good
weather. Everybody's in favor of good roads and good weather.

Said Christ spoke of immortality, good health and wisdom.
And that's really all he ever talked about. And during the
church sessions on Sunday afternoon, the pastor has rather
uniformly thrown these data at people. And when there were
new people present, their ears went up like these emerging
antennae that come out of these new cars, you know? Vwop!
And they went away with this tremendous onslaught of data
carefully parked in their medulla oblongata. This was news!

Where do you communicate? What do you communicate about?
There has to be some agreement before you can communicate.
The communicating datum. The communicating data. In
Operation Phoenix, the most communicating to date has been
something on that order. It's been on that order, and that
communicates. Let's collect some more of them on the
congress level, hmm? Let's find out what data communicated
or what data does communicate to the people who come in
here. Huh?

We'll set this up as a little private project between thee
and me. And when the congress is through, let's you have a
list of them, huh? Let's turn them in, and let's see if we
can break down a common denominator so that we can at least
write a Journal that will have appeal, and will be of
assistance to you as a professional auditor. 'Cause
what'll we put in this Journal? We'll just repeat the data
you've collected. Get the idea? Because we found out that
communicates! Well what communicates?

So, you've got a week's research project which would be
intensely beneficial. And I hope that on next Monday you
will have, next year, that you will have a list of the data
that you thought communicated or discovered, by talking to
this one and that, that you thought communicated out of the
lectures to the people there, or - this is two categories of
data, and category B, the data which you thought you were
able to communicate to the people.

Remember that category B - you might have communicated better
than I did, you understand - but category B finds you as a
participant in the game, not an observer. And it's probably
less accurate. You depended upon the suddenly startled
look on the person's face. Well, they might have just
remembered they left their electric iron on. The data
which is relayed by myself to that audience will find you
in the advantageous position of being able to discuss
something in the absence of participants, you see? In the
absence of one of the players. So, what was the
communication that went on? What did they communicate, what
did register? We're very interested in this, we'll expect
it from you Monday morning. Okay?

There will be a lot of data, which we will then coordinate,
and we'll give you the results on sometime later in the
week. Because it has to all be added and multiplied and
subtracted, you know? And, we will then know. Now, for
heaven sakes, confine your listing to a few words. See,
confine your listing. These people are really struck with
the idea there was a difference between win and lose.

You know, you're in for a little adventure! You're in for a
little adventure. Because you are going to be
flabbergasted, I know you will. Here and there, you will be
fascinated by what communicated. But more particularly,
with what they didn't know! Something has just been around,
gathering mold. It's just been hanging there, you know? And
nobody's been paying any attention to it at all for years!
And it just comes in as a piece of the stuff which was
relayed to demonstrate something else, and all of a sudden
somebody is terribly struck with this; that an individual
has a mental image picture which he sometimes looks at.
Now, that is awfully interesting.

Well, I'm being a little bit sarcastic here, and my ARC is
not very high, it's at this level. Because I face a good,
hard week's work. Good, good hard work this week. I don't
much look on it as work, it's a lot of fun, because I don't
know how to work anyhow. I never bothered to learn. No, all
I learned was how to get things done occasionally. That's a
different thing. I had a fellow one time, try to teach me
how to work, but he kept sitting down all the time, while
he was trying, so I abandoned studying at his heat.

Now, wherever - where we have a great many people
together - and this is the other mission I wish very much
that you could accomplish, and help accomplished; where you
have people gathered together, who have come from far and
disrelated spots in the country, you'll find that these
people are bringing in a great many pieces of
misinformation, which misinformation individually fitted
together collectively by all the people present becomes
misinformation!

They want their engrams run out. They want their
communication breaks with me, with you, and with the
organization, run out. They want to get rid of that
horrible Auditor's Code break. That horrible letter break.
They want to get this point clarified and that point
straightened out, one way or the other or they simply want
to spread more misinformation. Now whatever the mission
there, during the days of a congress, you will discover the
most amazing number of misinformations and rumors and so
forth, extant the first day. But not much communication on
them. They don't begin to burst forth till about the second
day. And then they fly around in a very fancy fashion but
on the third day, everybody - although the - all these things
might be true or might not be true, everybody's coming up
in tone and they feel a little better about it all. About
the fourth day, to hell with it. Everybody's happy, and
ARC is good and high, and that didn't make any difference
at all. Whatever that was, you see, it's rehabilitated to a
very marked degree.

Never fails to happen. Why? Because of the amount of
communication present in a congress. That all by itself,
all by itself solves its own problems. So may I ask you not
to get terribly upset with people? When they give you the
wild pieces of data which they'll give you. And don't
bother to spend too much time explaining them. Right! Just
talk to them. Don't bother to explain anything to them,
just talk to them. Make more communication in the middle of
the congress. You understand? Just make more communication.
Whether you're talking about good roads, good weather or
the hardness or the softness of seats in the course or the
horrible Auditor Code breaks which are pulled by - . I don't
care what you talk about one way or the other, for God
sakes, talk! That's the amount of it. Now we'll - we'll just
make lots of communication in this congress, you know.

It's an amazing thing how much flies around, but there can
always be more. I swear, that if enough communication could
be circulated at one of these congresses everybody would go
home Clear. And the only reason they don't go home Clear is
because not enough talking was done. Now one of the reasons
that happens, is the people themselves don't get an
opportunity individually to talk back to me, and I spend
an awful lot of time talking to them!

Well, this in part is not totally bad. Because remember
most of the people present have gone downhill simply
because they did all the talking and somebody else
originating information is merciful and decent and a
pleasant thing to have happen. You see, it sort of balances
the books. Furthermore, they've been looking for answers
for years, and have gone into apathy on the subject and I
seem to be able to give them lots of answers.

So, they are very happy about this sort of thing.
Their - they've been looking for Mama to say "Okay" for all
these years, and I come along and I say, "The dynamic
principle of existence is 'Survive'" and this they know is
an answer. See, all they've been looking for is an okay,
and they get this one, so, they're very happy about it.
I'll even say "Okay." You might - I won't even vaguely try to
describe to you what the program and so forth will go on at
the congress or exactly what the outline of the lectures
is. I'd be very happy to place in each one of your hands a
complete outline of the lectures but I don't know from Adam
what they'll be! Beyond this fact, beyond this fact: The
book in charge of the congress will be Dianetics 1955!
Dianetics 1955! will be the textbook of this congress. And
I to a very marked extent am going to cover Dianetics 1955!
from cover to cover. The data in it, in those lectures. And
that's all I'm going to cover. Now a couple of you were
sorting this book, and let me take this opportunity - let me
take this opportunity right now to thank all of you for
your very very good work on the book. You know that book
wouldn't even vaguely have been here or have been produced
for the congress, if you hadn't pitched in, when you did,
and worked on it. So thank you very much, from me to you.
Come on, say "You're welcome."

Audience: You're welcome!

Okay, that's better, that's better.

(end of lecture)

[The students of the 9th ACC went to the Unification
Congress of Dianeticists and Scientologists in Phoenix,
Arizona from December 28th to the 31st, 1954.]








